Brands and Social media: What consumers think?
CNBC Africa looks at the insurance industry and how volatile social media sentiment can be towards a brand joined by Melanie Malherbe, Head of client engagement, BrandsEye, to talk on what consumers have been saying about brands.
Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:21:25 GMT
Disclaimer: The following content is generated automatically by a GPT AI and may not be accurate. To verify the details, please watch the video
AI Generated Summary
- The insurance industry faces volatile shifts in social media sentiment, requiring brands to be proactive in addressing feedback and complaints.
- Interpreting social media data requires a balance between algorithmic analysis and human intuition to accurately capture nuances in consumer sentiment.
- Effective handling of customer interactions on social media is essential for building trust and loyalty, as highlighted by recent case studies in the industry.
In today's digital age, the power of social media sentiment can make or break a brand's reputation in a matter of moments. The insurance industry, in particular, has experience with the volatile nature of consumer sentiment on various platforms. According to Melania from Brand's Eye, sentiment within this sector can shift rapidly, highlighting the importance of how brands handle and respond to feedback. Brand Zai's analysis revealed that MyWay Insurance saw a consistent increase in positive sentiment due to their excellent customer service and operational efficiency, while OneLife Direct faced a significant drop in sentiment following customer queries. However, their proactive approach in addressing these issues has allowed them to rebuild trust and garner positive reviews. This real-time feedback loop underscores the need for brands to be vigilant and responsive in managing their online presence. When it comes to interpreting social media data, the distinction between human analysis and algorithm-driven insights is crucial. While machines can process vast amounts of data, they often struggle to capture nuances such as slang, sarcasm, and emotional context. In a recent example involving Facebook, the decision to replace human moderators with algorithms resulted in the dissemination of inaccurate and inappropriate content to users. The margin of error for algorithms in processing big data can be as high as 30-40%, making human oversight essential in ensuring accurate and relevant messaging. Despite advancements in artificial intelligence, human intuition and understanding remain key in deciphering complex social interactions. Human-verified data often provides a more nuanced understanding of consumer sentiment and can help brands avoid misinterpretations. The trend of the week highlighted the need for brands to handle customer complaints effectively on social media. An incident involving MTN responding to a negative customer review with an inappropriate gif underscored the importance of maintaining professionalism and empathy in all interactions. Conversely, Tassie's swift and genuine response to a similar complaint demonstrated the positive impact of proactive customer service. This case study serves as a reminder of the public nature of social media platforms and the potential for both positive and negative publicity. Additionally, the conversation around school hair regulations in South Africa gained international attention, with celebrities like Solange Knowles weighing in on the issue. While social media can amplify important societal discussions, the long-term impact of these trends remains uncertain. As the country grapples with calls for change and social justice, brands must remain attuned to evolving consumer expectations and values. By engaging with customers authentically and responsibly, brands can harness the power of social media to strengthen their reputation and build lasting relationships.